Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Online Communities’

No, it’s not; it sucks. Hey, I might be opinionated, but at least I am consistent. I have written in the past how manufactured ways for singles to meet is not ideal. Online dating objectifies people in order to simplify profiling. It forces us to put people into boxes, boxes that aren’t even important when looking for a good partner. We can only measure things such as height, income, and  other variables that can be quantified. In the process, it leaves out the most important characteristics such as generosity, kindness, curiosity, sparkle in eyes, and humour, because these traits can’t be measured in cyberspace.

And, if you think you are too busy to date, so you use the internet as a ‘time saver’, a sample of users reported they spent an average of twelve hours a week browsing profiles and responding to messages, which resulted in a mere 1.8 hours of face to face interaction (Frost, 2008) That is time which could be spent reading, exercising, or catching up real people, in the real world.

Then there is the cry, ‘But my neighbour/best friend/uncle’s donkey met their partner online! So it must work!’ This, my friends, is purely down to sample size. If you have thousands (if not millions) of people Internet dating, there will be some people who find each other. Just like if you throw enough mud at the wall, some of it will stick. Not to say, my dear readers, that you are mud! Au contraire; you are fabulous, which is why I don’t want you to torture yourself by internet dating. Look, if you’re happy to go on 100 dates with complete strangers, please go ahead. Anything you put enough time and effort into, you will achieve. Just forget about ever having another bubble bath again, you won’t have time.

Still not convinced? Jeesh, you are a tough cookie. Q: Who are these people that you are meeting? A: They are complete strangers, linked to no one. You have no mutual connections, nor has anyone passed the V-4’ed test (Vouched for by  someone you know). Because they are strangers, you do not have to give them the benefit of the doubt. Your ex-flatmate, Susan, is not there to tell you that ‘Jon is a really nice guy, but a bit shy at first’. It takes time to get to know someone (It took me a year and a half to get to know my husband! Then again, he is one of the ‘slow burning’ Englishman which I will write about in the next post, I promise!) And, since y’all are obsessed with using chemistry as the most important indicator as to whether a relationship will succeed (see what I’ve said about this in the past) it’s easy to immediately eliminate someone after the first meeting due to lack of chemistry.

Do activities you love, enjoy life, be open, come on my flirting and walking tours if you are London based; don’t be so focused on this. The right person will come when you are ready, not when you *think* you are ready. My new favourite quote is, ‘With the faith of a mustard seed, you can move mountains’ In my next post, I will be answering a reader’s question, ‘Why can’t men give up internet dating even though they want to be “exclusive” with you?’

Want more good advice? Join my newsletter!

Subscribe to our newsletter

Read Full Post »

Do you remember the days when Facebook was a small, exclusive social media group, where only University students could participate and invites were hard to come by? No? Maybe your experience on FB is what it has become today, a huge mismash of social media, encompassing the masses.  Consequently, instead of a small, select group of friends using FB as a way to communicate amongst each other,  it has now come to the point that if anyone sends you a friend request, you are expected to accept. This is even if it’s from the shopkeeper down the street, who only knows that you often run out of milk come Friday evening.

Česky: Logo Facebooku English: Facebook logo E...

Image via Wikipedia

In parallel with an evolving society, FB has also evolved. Unfortunately, I have not evolved with it. I still use it as a way to share personal information and post pictures, with a select few, whom I consider to be real friends – both on and off- line. I know that I have annoyed more than a few people by not accepting their (by now, redundant) friend requests. As mentioned, it’s almost taken for granted that if you send a ‘friend request’ it will be accepted. I am ‘hidden’ as deeply as possible in the FB dungeon, but it still is not enough. I also know that I will not be Ms. Popular at the upcoming 20th High School reunion, where in a moment of weakness, I accepted a number of friend requests from old high school classmates. After quickly realising what a big mistake I had made, I then de-friended them all. Not one of my finer moments, but I am not the type to find mundane, children updates, interesting.  In my FB crusade, I haven’t just alienated, otherwise nice, people with children. I have also managed to confuse many a family member with rejections to their friend requests. As people are just starting to realize, information you share with you friends and information you share with your mother, shouldn’t necessarily be the same.

The amount of people that I’ve had to explain why I hadn’t accepted their friend request, well, really isn’t that high. Fortunately, I wasn’t very popular to being with. However, besides noting that I am still trying to use FB in it’s old form and not succeeding, I have also come to the conclusion that FB isn’t as fun and interesting as it used to be. I have noticed that friends, whose status updates and photos I used to look forward to peering at, aren’t interacting on FB anymore.  Undoubtedly the usage has lessened, but why?

My initial thought was that people have the attention span of a gnat and were already on to the next thing. (And it wasn’t called Google +) Granted, not a very nice conclusion about my friends, but I am holding a grudge from not getting enough information about them. But then I realised that while I try and remain a FB purist, against adversity and some fast talking, most people have evolved along with FB. Some use it as a way to connect with everyone from their pastor to their one-night stand. Trying to appeal to such a wide range of people, inevitably, means that you have to work from the lowest common denominator. So, rather than sticking to only posting updates about juice preferences, or other uninteresting, but non-controversial topics, most people have just given up.

The social social anthropological question is “Does an increase in population usage always have to be relegated to  lowest common denominator?”

Read Full Post »